Using only published aggregate data, adjustment for such biases may be impossible. Headtohead comparison of length of stay, patients outcome and satisfaction in switzerland before and after swissdrgimplementation in 2012. Methods patients with active psa were randomised 1. Head tohead superiority trials constitute a true challenge for investigators because they are eagerly awaited by patients and the regulatory authorities.
Significance was determined at a level of head to head comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin o group 3 rosuvastatin 20 mg, and o group 4 rosuvastatin 40 mg. A comparison study of active head restraints for neck. The objective of the randomized head to head comparison of pitavastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin for safety and efficacy quantity and quality of ldl patrol trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin head to head in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The objective of the randomized headtohead comparison of pitavastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin for safety and efficacy quantity and quality of ldl patrol trial was to compare the safety. Edc versus paper a head to head comparison uedc vs. The following analysis explains why mobymax excels and highlights the strong evidence used in the comparison. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the u. Guselkumab was more effective than secukinumab in patients with plaque psoriasis and the subset of patients with selfreported psoriatic arthritis in a randomized, doubleblind, head to head comparison study over 1 year abstract. Different concepts were validated by sled tests using hybridiii dummies equipped with the newly developed tridneck. To assess the efficacy at lowering lowdensity lipoprotein. A head tohead comparison of the eq5d5l and aqol8d for longterm publicly waitlisted bariatric surgery patients before and 3 months after bariatric surgery. An observational study in two tertiary university centres.
Smolen j, nash p, tahir h, schulzekoops h, li l, hojnik m, gellett a, liuleage s, pillai s, mease p. The atherosclerosis risk in communities aric study, performed on,342 individuals, provided evidence that protection. Microscopic techniques, combined with studied experience, provide for a discriminating means to examine and compare hair. Berthelsen1,2, jann mortensen1,2, peter oturai1,2, seppo w. A headtohead comparative phase ii study of standard. Objectives to compare over 2 years the safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab, in combination with methotrexate mtx, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ra. Head to head analysis showing that student motivation works mobymax is two to three times more effective than other leading solutions. View enhanced pdf access article on wiley online library html view. Hierarchically, we gave greater importance to the first subgroup because it contained studies that undertook a headtohead comparison of samples within the same study, which removes confounding. For our metaanalyses, we used data points obtained from individual studies. Jul 11, 2018 recently, the concept of sepsis was redefined by an international task force. Pdf a comparison study of active head restraints for neck.
First headtohead comparison of novel oral anticoagulants. From a 50% random sample of the randomized controlled trials rcts published in journals indexed in. Jan 24, 2012 hierarchically, we gave greater importance to the first subgroup because it contained studies that undertook a head to head comparison of samples within the same study, which removes confounding. Different concepts were validated by sled tests using. Biologicnaive patients with active ra and an inadequate response to mtx. In this observational study, mayo clinic researchers used an insurance database to compare effectiveness and safety of the three mostcommonly. Objective to compare the relative bioavailability, safety and tolerability of oral methotrexate mtx and subcutaneous sc mtx administered via an autoinjector mtxai in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ra. May 31, 2017 the results from the first realworld, matched headtohead study comparing allcause healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization hcru among novel oral anticoagulants noacs were presented at the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research 22nd annual international meeting in boston. The study was done at 175 centres of which 151 recruited patients in europe. Head tohead comparison of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin the safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. There were also considerable costs associated with the storage of paper ecrfs at the sites as well as storage of all paper studyrelated documents within the trial master file. Japanese patients with shpt on hemodialysis were randomized to receive evocalcet or cinacalcet 317 patients each for 30 weeks. A headtohead comparison of the efficacy and safety of.
Head to head comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Comparative effectiveness without headtohead trials. Unless the patients are similar, it is impossible to tell whether a difference in the two arms of the study is. While both suboxone and vivitrol outperform placebo medication, this critically important study pitted these two commonly prescribed medications against each other. Some studies of targeted therapies in ra include an active control arm to determine relative efficacy, yet carefully avoid any formal comparison of the targeted therapies. The glp1 ra agents have all been extensively evaluated in phase iii clinical programs table 1. A headtohead comparison of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biologicnaive patients with active psoriatic arthritis. However, both the risk stratification in patients with acute infections and the identification of sepsis are still challenges for clinicians. Indirect crosstrial treatment comparisons are possible, but can be biased by crosstrial differences in patient characteristics.
Guselkumab was more effective than secukinumab in patients with plaque psoriasis and the subset of patients with selfreported psoriatic arthritis in a randomized, doubleblind, headtohead comparison study over 1 year abstract. Nevertheless, a few headtohead studies have been conducted. Headtohead comparison of the new calcimimetic agent evocalcet with cinacalcet in japanese hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism masafumi fukagawa1, ryutaro shimazaki2 and tadao akizawa3. All eight trials were designed as noninferiority trials. A headtohead comparison of ixekizumab and adalimumab in. Boehringer ingelheim pharmaceuticals issued a press release. Clinical studies have shown, and it is accepted by cv experts around the world, that atorvastatin lowers ldl to a significantly greater extent than simvastatin. To map the current status of head to head comparative randomized evidence and to assess whether funding may impact on trial design and results. Headtohead comparison of qsofa and sirs criteria in. Comparison of the canadian ct head rule and the new. Head comparison of arrhythmia discrimination performance of subcutaneous and transvenous icd arrhythmia detection algorithms. In a study where two treatments are being compared, it is critical that patients in each arm of the study are similar. Comparison of the canadian ct head rule and the new orleans. Randomized headtohead comparison of pitavastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin for safety and efficacy quantity and quality of ldl.
However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the optimal intervention programmes in t2d. The primary efficacy endpoint in all of the trials was change in a1c from baseline with a. Headtohead analysis showing that student motivation works mobymax is two to three times more effective than other leading solutions. This is a real life study, the first that did a head to head comparison of cat, ccq and sgrq in three continuous visits. Efficacy and safety outcomes from a randomized, openlabel, blinded assessor study through 52 weeks abstract. A summary of the design of the head to head studies is provided in table 2.
The aim of the study was to compare the new orleans criteria and the new orleans criteria according to their diagnostic performance in patients with mild head injury. Headtohead comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus. The study, in patients with type 2 diabetes, showed no significant effect of epa or dha supplementation 4 gd for 6 wk on crp, il6, and tnf. Ioannidisg adepartment of medicine and aging sciences, university of. Varying the duration of each stage can provide different points of data to. In an observational study, apixaban was associated with the least major bleeding. Why not compare results from non headtohead studies. Introduction current pharmacological therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes t2d are challenged by lack of sustainability and borderline firm evidence of real longterm health benefits.
The members of the ixorar study group are listed in appendix 2. The purpose of this report, 2006 wage comparability study. However, the added value of these new criteria in the emergency department ed. Nevertheless, a few head to head studies have been conducted. Headtohead comparison of accuracy of a rapid pointof. Pdf a comparison study of active head restraints for. This international task force of experts recommended using the quick sequential organ failure assessment qsofa criteria instead of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome sirs criteria to classify patients at high risk for death. A head tohead comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biologicalnaive patients with active psoriatic arthritis. A summary of the design of the headtohead studies is provided in table 2. Comparing dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban in the.
Why not compare results from non head tohead studies. Study confirms better immune response for flu vaccines. Johnbeck1,2, ulrich knigge2,3, annika loft1,2, anne k. Head to head comparison of length of stay, patients outcome and satisfaction in switzerland before and after swissdrgimplementation in 2012. In the first study of its kind, a headtohead comparison of three flu vaccines targeted to seniors against the standard vaccine found that enhanced versions produce better immune response, which may translate to better protection. Neck injuries caused by rearend collisions have become a major problem in traffic safety over the last two decades, however, surprisingly little effort has been made so far to improve car seat and head rest design.
Headtohead, randomised, crossover study of oral versus. Several other factors were also examined as spirometry, dyspnea, 6mwt and bode index. Atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin are available for intensive, aggressive lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol ldlclowering therapy in clinical practice. The following table lists headtohead studies that have been done. Nov 21, 2018 head to head comparison of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin the safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Accordingly, lifestyle intervention remains the corner stone in the management of t2d.
In this observational study, mayo clinic researchers used an insurance database to compare effectiveness and safety of the three mostcommonly prescribed doacs dabigatran pradaxa, apixaban eliquis, and rivaroxaban xarelto in patients with nonvalvular atrial. North dakota head start and early head start, is to provide north dakota head start and early head start administrators a tool for objectively evaluating the wages and salaries of their staff relative to other head start programs in. Data was collected prospectively for patients presenting to the ed with minor head injury. May 31, 2017 may 31, 2017 the results from the first realworld, matched headtohead study comparing allcause healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization hcru among novel oral anticoagulants noacs were presented at the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research 22nd annual international meeting in boston. Comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for. Headtohead comparison of accuracy of a rapid pointofcare. Objectives to compare efficacy and safety of ixekizumab ixe to adalimumab ada in biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugnaive patients with both active psoriatic arthritis psa and skin disease and inadequate response to conventional synthetic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drug csdmards. Paper healthpoint case study forth to clarify any information. Merola j, li s, hsu m, karyekar c, flavin s, randazzo b, coates l. Trials can be designed with multiple arms and multiple stages that allow several comparisons to be built in for example, the comparison of an investigational medicine to a placebo, an additive model, and a headtohead comparison against the current standard of care.
This study has some limitations that should be reported. Objectives to compare early and complete skin clearance by the il17a. Conclusions through 2 years of blinded treatment in this first headtohead study between biologic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs in ra patients with an inadequate response to mtx, subcutaneous abatacept and adalimumab were similarly efficacious based on clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes. A headtohead comparison of the eq5d5l and aqol8d for longterm publicly waitlisted bariatric surgery patients before and 3 months after bariatric surgery julie a. Do we really need headtohead comparison trials with. North dakota head start and early head start, is to provide north dakota head start and early head start administrators a tool for objectively evaluating the wages and salaries of their staff relative to other head start programs in the state. Comparison is the cornerstone of the majority of biology, both past and present. Headtohead comparison of the new calcimimetic agent. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the optimal intervention programmes in t2d ensuring both compliance as. Sepsis is a common cause of critical illness and mortality worldwide 1, 2, accounting for 10% of intensive care unit icu cases, and it has an inhospital mortality rate of 10 to 20% 3,4,5. In direct confrontation or conflict at close quarters. Exxelerate nct01500278 was a 104week 2year randomised, singleblind double blind until week 12 and investigator blind thereafter, parallelgroup, head to head superiority study comparing certolizumab pegol with adalimumab, both with background methotrexate.
Medical university of south carolina, charleston, south carolina, usa. No head tohead studies have focused on early responses to interleukin il17 vs. Following the table, a brief discussion is provided for each study, in alphabetical order. If these studies are methodologically rigorous particularly with regard to selection criteria, this type of study could profoundly change our routine clinical practice. This study shows a comparison of different active head restraint concepts, which guarantee a reduction of the distance between head and head rest during a rearend collision. Do we really need headtohead comparison trials with statins. Methods ample is a phase iiib, 2year, randomised, investigatorblinded study with a 1year primary endpoint. View the article pdf and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours. Guselkumab was more effective than secukinumab in patients.
The inclusion of more than one targeted therapy in a study does not necessarily make it a true headtohead comparison. Headtohead randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored. Firstly this study has been limited to one country and performed in one centre. A headtohead comparative phase ii study of standard urine. Headtohead comparison of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin the safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Methods in this randomised, multicenter, openlabel, threeway crossover study, patients. Headtohead comparison of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Review of headtohead study designs in rheumatoid arthritis. Opioid overdoses alone accounted for 33,000 overdoses in the united states in 2015. Some studies of targeted therapies in ra include an active control arm to determine relative efficacy, yet carefully avoid.
However, headtohead trials where active agents are compared, rather than an active agent and placebo, offer the highest level of evidence. First headtohead comparison of novel oral anticoagulants in. The following table lists head to head studies that have been done. Pdf headtohead comparison of aggressive conventional. Clinical studies have shown, and it is accepted by cv experts around the world, that atorvastatin lowers ldl to. Our study was a head to head comparative phase ii study of standard urine. Comparison of urine in a conventional culture model versus dna nextgeneration sequencing ngs to accurately identify and provide information on resistance factors mobile genetic elements is warranted. Campbell1 martin hensher2 amanda neil1 alison venn1 petr otahal1 stephen wilkinson3 andrew j. Randomized head to head comparison of pitavastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin for safety and efficacy quantity and quality of ldl. From a 50% random sample of the randomized controlled trials rcts published in journals indexed in pubmed during 2011, we selected the trials with. The absence of headtohead trials is a common challenge in comparative effectiveness research and health technology assessment. Exxelerate nct01500278 was a 104week 2year randomised, singleblind double blind until week 12 and investigator blind thereafter, parallelgroup, headtohead superiority study comparing certolizumab pegol with adalimumab, both with background methotrexate.
985 414 299 1429 1278 1458 1622 1510 117 1224 1627 633 1034 1057 919 584 415 308 193 575 1402 286 1067 182 47 1384 664 1151 499 1407 1305 565 1116 191 556 38 112